Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 10:03

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s on the Hamptons Status List? - The Cut
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Analysts Look to Tesla’s Robotaxi Launch After Stock Hit From Musk-Trump Spat - Investopedia
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Why do I want to give up on men?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
New body size database for marine animals is a “library of life” - Ars Technica
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Power Rankings: RBC Canadian Open - PGA Tour
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What Really Killed The Neanderthals? A Space Physicist Has a Radical Idea - ScienceAlert
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How to watch the 2025 Tony Awards on Sunday - NPR
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.